Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 hours ago, heather said:

This is a common misconception about the conservatorship. People within them still have MANY rights as adults including the right to have children.

I tried to search and could not find anything.  It is also a situation where she lost custody before the c-ship.  She did not have the children under the c-ship.  It would make no sense for her to have the right to make legal and medical decisions for her children when she cannot make those decisions herself.   I just cannot see a judge awarding her custody rights in that situation.  Can anyone find any legal documents allowing this or actual copies of their current agreement?  I am really curious.

Posted
1 minute ago, tonyfan said:

Anyone can say anything in a magazine article.  Is this really true?  Is there any legal documents available?  Is there any record of a review of the custody agreement?

 

OH PLEASE :frenchy: Billboard is no tabloid. Just admit you’re a flop fan before you embarrass yourself more :ashley:

  • Like 2
Posted
4 hours ago, tonyfan said:

I tried to search and could not find anything.  It is also a situation where she lost custody before the c-ship.  She did not have the children under the c-ship.  It would make no sense for her to have the right to make legal and medical decisions for her children when she cannot make those decisions herself.   I just cannot see a judge awarding her custody rights in that situation.  Can anyone find any legal documents allowing this or actual copies of their current agreement?  I am really curious.

You're not going to find legal documents about minors. She didn't lose custody she voluntarily gave it up, that's actually a big difference that makes regaining it different. Primary custody in this case wouldn't be about making legal/medical decisions and very obviously about the amount of UNSUPERVISED time she has with her children. I know you're a big opponent to the conservatorship, but you need to open your eyes, do some research and realize Britney is NOT a poor locked up miserable woman under it. She has MANY MANY "freedoms" and rights as an adult. Things aren't black and white and we are not and will never be unless she releases it, privy to the details of her situation. We can only judge what we see and what we see is Britney happy, healthy, and ALONE with her children.

  • Like 3
Posted

It’s hilarious how fans like to speak like they know specific details of her PERSONAL situation, none of us know Britney personally or what goes on behind closed doors, it’s quite obvious she’s not some prisoner, fans need to mind their own business when it comes to this kind of stuff.

  • Like 3
Posted
On 2/27/2018 at 2:53 AM, tonyfan said:

I tried to search and could not find anything.  It is also a situation where she lost custody before the c-ship.  She did not have the children under the c-ship.  It would make no sense for her to have the right to make legal and medical decisions for her children when she cannot make those decisions herself.   I just cannot see a judge awarding her custody rights in that situation.  Can anyone find any legal documents allowing this or actual copies of their current agreement?  I am really curious.

The C-Ship revolves around financial stuff, meaning she doesn't have full control over her money only. In regards to anything else, she's free to do as what she pleases.

Sure, it might cripple her decision making process a bit, but she's definitely not even close to a child rights wise. The C-Ship is not THAT dire as some have made it out to be.

  • Like 2
Posted
Quote

According to Us Weekly, former backup dancer is requesting $20,000 more a month in child support “to recognize the sacrifices he’s made,” a source told the mag. The source also pointed out that since Federline has custody of their two sons, Sean Preston and Jayden James, "he could hathe ve threatened to cut off access to the kids, but has not.”

 

The "sacrifice" part killed me. Like, seriously K-Fat? PLus, since SP&JJ stay with Brit most of the time, why he needs more money? I'm pretty sure Brit buys them everything. F*ck this guy he obviously in a huge financial problem with his other 128939813 kids. If I had a chance I swear I'd go back in time and put a condom on K-Fat's dad's tiny d*ck so that he wouldn't even exist.

Posted

I mean, it's TMZ, but this seems to be heating up a little - Papa Spears is now involved:

 

Britney Spears' dad, Jamie, is super upset at Kevin Federline, who called him pleading for more child support when, in fact, all he wants is to jump on her gravy train.

Sources connected to Britney tell TMZ, last Friday K-Fed called Jamie and said he was in a financial bind and wanted to talk about raising his child support. TMZ broke the story K-Fed has been pulling in $20k a month for child support for years, but he now says it's not enough.

We're told Jamie was suspicious and asked Kevin where the $20k was going, but Kevin hedged.

Our sources say, last week, Jamie got a letter from Kevin's lawyer, asking him if they could sit down and talk. They did indeed have a talk, and we're told the lawyer explained now that 12-year-old Sean and 11-year-old Jayden have gotten older, Kevin needed more than $20k.

We're told Jamie pressed again, asking what the kids needed that they weren't getting. We're told Kevin's lawyer wouldn't answer, but said his client needed the means to take care of the 2 kids at Britney's level. Jamie fired back ... Britney's taking care of the kids the way she always did -- nothing's changed.

Our sources say the lawyer repeatedly talked about Britney's recent successes -- particularly her sold-out Vegas shows -- saying she was making a lot more money. We're told Jamie kept pushing back, saying Britney's success has nothing to do with the needs of the children, and his daughter wasn't responsible for taking care of Kevin and his other families.

Britney has paid Kevin a fortune in various forms of support over the years. When they divorced in 2007, she cut him a check for $1.3 million and he got spousal support for several years and continues to get child support.

We're told Kevin and his lawyer never named a figure and never gave a single example of the children's unmet needs. 

Posted

If this update is true, then good for Jamie, don’t let up on him, if Kevin’s having financial problems then boo fucking hoo, get a real job!!!

 

Britney is not responsible for Kevin’s lifestyle or his other kids...just SP and JJ and since they seem to be with her most of time anyway, she’s got it all covered on her end.

 

 $20,000 a month should be more than enough for when they’re with Kevin, he should be forced to show his expenses.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
36 minutes ago, MonaLisa613 said:

If this update is true, then good for Jamie, don’t let up on him, if Kevin’s having financial problems then boo fucking hoo, get a real job!!!

 

Britney is not responsible for Kevin’s lifestyle or his other kids...just SP and JJ and since they seem to be with her most of time anyway, she’s got it all covered on her end.

 

 $20,000 a month should be more than enough for when they’re with Kevin, he should be forced to show his expenses.

 

 

Agreed. We'll see where things end up ... I read somewhere else that this is actually the second time Kevin's come to her for increased child support, and general consensus seems to be - well, that he just wants more money.

 

I remember thinking when Kevin had his SIXTH kid - how tf is he affording all of these kids???? Especially since his DJ job is up and down and he only makes about $1k/show. When he has one.

Posted
30 minutes ago, MakeMySugarFall said:

Agreed. We'll see where things end up ... I read somewhere else that this is actually the second time Kevin's come to her for increased child support, and general consensus seems to be - well, that he just wants more money.

 

I remember thinking when Kevin had his SIXTH kid - how tf is he affording all of these kids???? Especially since his DJ job is up and down and he only makes about $1k/show. When he has one.

IKR!!! How is he taking care of all these kids and does his wife even work?? Britney isn’t a fucking bank, he needs to get that through his head!!

 

Plus the fact that he’s not willing to answer Jamie’s questions about what the money is going toward is extremely sketchy, the courts should force him to share  that info.

  • Like 1
Posted

Another update: Kevin Federline is ready to take Britney Spears to court over child support increase, source says (Aol)

 

Choice paragraph:

Given her recent financial success, the source says, Federline feels like he deserves more in child support payments, noting that the dancer and reality star currently receives around $20,000 a month from his ex-wife. “Kevin could have done this years ago, but he didn’t. If he had, he would have been receiving two or three times the amount of child support that he has been receiving,” the source explains.

The source adds that Federline hoped to amicably work out new child support payments with Spears, but they haven’t been able to come to an agreement, noting that the matter could go to court “soon.” “[Kevin] was disappointed that they couldn’t sit down and resolve this amicably.”

Posted

I have a feeling this is gonna get ugly but good for Jamie, if a judge orders she pays, then so be it, but don’t give in without exposing if she’s paying for things not related to SP and JJ. 

 

Also, I’m sorry but if I was her this would make me wanna start fighting to get that cship lifted so I could fight to get custody of my kids back!!

 

 

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, MonaLisa613 said:

Also, I’m sorry but if I was her this would make me wanna start fighting to get that cship lifted so I could fight to get custody of my kids back!!

 

 

 

 

Same tbh

Posted
7 minutes ago, sairaannopee99 said:

Same tbh

I can’t help but wonder if Kevin could be the reason this is still in place, like maybe he’d cut her time with the kids if it were removed??

 

Cuz I can’t see Britney enjoying this thing and does Jamie really enjoy having to go through this shit too.

 

Obviosuly we’re outsiders looking in but she appears to be in such a better place compared to 07, how will they really know if she’s better unless they let her try living without the cship, it’s been like 11 years, at least give her a chance, if she starts to revert, have it immediately reinstated.

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, MonaLisa613 said:

I can’t help but wonder if Kevin could be the reason this is still in place, like maybe he’d cut her time with the kids if it were removed??

 

Cuz I can’t see Britney enjoying this thing and does Jamie really enjoy having to go through this shit too.

 

Obviosuly we’re outsiders looking in but she appears to be in such a better place compared to 07, how will they really know if she’s better unless they let her try living without the cship, it’s been like 11 years, at least give her a chance, if she starts to revert, have it immediately reinstated.

Well it's important for kids to see both of their parents when it's possible. I don't think Britney needs the c-ship either but like you said none of us know what's happening behind the scenes, what the sittuation really is. We don't have access to her medical files or court files

Posted
2 hours ago, MonaLisa613 said:

I can’t help but wonder if Kevin could be the reason this is still in place, like maybe he’d cut her time with the kids if it were removed??

 

Cuz I can’t see Britney enjoying this thing and does Jamie really enjoy having to go through this shit too.

 

Obviosuly we’re outsiders looking in but she appears to be in such a better place compared to 07, how will they really know if she’s better unless they let her try living without the cship, it’s been like 11 years, at least give her a chance, if she starts to revert, have it immediately reinstated.

I’ve also read, a loooooong time ago, that Britney is protected against any potential lawsuits from that contemptuous time period, if certain individuals chose to file them. Another reason to leave it in place, if true. 

Posted
8 hours ago, MonaLisa613 said:

I have a feeling this is gonna get ugly but good for Jamie, if a judge orders she pays, then so be it, but don’t give in without exposing if she’s paying for things not related to SP and JJ. 

 

Also, I’m sorry but if I was her this would make me wanna start fighting to get that cship lifted so I could fight to get custody of my kids back!!

 

 

 

 

I have no idea about US laws and I may sound stupid but, what's the relation between her c-ship and children custody? I mean why it's impossible to have custody of her children when she's under the c-ship? Wasn't it for the kids at first place? She agreed to go under a c-ship to spend more time with her kids, right? I'm lost. :wyd: 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines