Veronica the witch Posted November 15, 2014 #27 Report Posted November 15, 2014 Britney probably already melted the metal of that grammy and made herself some cute jewelry i don't think she cares about awards anymore but yeah she deserves more
BLACKOUT<3 Posted November 15, 2014 Author #28 Report Posted November 15, 2014 Britney probably already melted the metal of that grammy and made herself some cute jewelry i don't think she cares about awards anymore but yeah she deserves more the grammy is fake gold lmao... not even -1000000000000 karats
Veronica the witch Posted November 15, 2014 #29 Report Posted November 15, 2014 the grammy is fake gold lmao... not even -1000000000000 karats LOL yes thats why i said "metal" instead of "gold" she probably made a chain for her dogs 1
BLACKOUT<3 Posted November 15, 2014 Author #30 Report Posted November 15, 2014 LOL yes thats why i said "metal" instead of "gold" she probably made a chain for her dogs justin timberlake is still pretty thirsty for britneys pussy lbr hes still getting fucked by his husband
Brian.TheDog Posted November 15, 2014 #31 Report Posted November 15, 2014 so does that mean Taylor is a vocal acrobat?
ooh la la Posted November 16, 2014 #32 Report Posted November 16, 2014 grammys are musical snobs they probably would regard britney spears music as a guilty pleasure. which is stupid music is meant to be entertaining and evoke emotion. for instance it is accepted among musical critics and people who consider themselves have "good" music taste that the beatles are brilliant and anyone who thinks other wise doesn't know what they are talking about. i hate the Beatles i find them so depressing and their songs are very basic but if certain people continually praise something and say it is genius people are most of the time like sheep and agree. it's like when an artist paints abstract art and an "expert" says it's great and genius then other people agree that it's great because if an expert says it it must be true and they hand over their money and buy the art.
toxicxxkat Posted November 16, 2014 #33 Report Posted November 16, 2014 I will never understand the big deal about the Grammy's - or even Oscars for that matter in the acting field. They're decided by a bunch of guys who sit in a basement (not literally but you get my point) and decide what's the best that year. They show no reflection of what people actually think of the song/movie/album/person at all. They don't matter in my opinion and Britney doesn't need them. She's got plenty of other awards where it matters (although she does deserve more and often gets unnecessarily snubbed by of award shows who get paid to kiss the asses of other artists)
BLACKOUT<3 Posted November 16, 2014 Author #34 Report Posted November 16, 2014 grammys are musical snobs they probably would regard britney spears music as a guilty pleasure. which is stupid music is meant to be entertaining and evoke emotion. for instance it is accepted among musical critics and people who consider themselves have "good" music taste that the beatles are brilliant and anyone who thinks other wise doesn't know what they are talking about. i hate the Beatles i find them so depressing and their songs are very basic but if certain people continually praise something and say it is genius people are most of the time like sheep and agree. it's like when an artist paints abstract art and an "expert" says it's great and genius then other people agree that it's great because if an expert says it it must be true and they hand over their money and buy the art. The Beatles can suck a dick or two... They're annoying
BLACKOUT<3 Posted November 16, 2014 Author #35 Report Posted November 16, 2014 grammys are musical snobs they probably would regard britney spears music as a guilty pleasure. which is stupid music is meant to be entertaining and evoke emotion. for instance it is accepted among musical critics and people who consider themselves have "good" music taste that the beatles are brilliant and anyone who thinks other wise doesn't know what they are talking about. i hate the Beatles i find them so depressing and their songs are very basic but if certain people continually praise something and say it is genius people are most of the time like sheep and agree. it's like when an artist paints abstract art and an "expert" says it's great and genius then other people agree that it's great because if an expert says it it must be true and they hand over their money and buy the art. The Beatles can suck a dick or two... They're annoying
killthelights Posted November 16, 2014 #36 Report Posted November 16, 2014 Tbh britney doesn't need Grammys to prove herself because she's already a legend. It would be nice if she got recognized but I don't think she would even care lmfao
yessy09 Posted November 16, 2014 #38 Report Posted November 16, 2014 I'm just gonna say this... Milli Vanilli won a grammy Grammys are not important to me, and they shouldn't be to anyone Milli vanilli won a grammy but jimi hendrix, Bob marley, Diana Ross, Janis Joplin, Bjork and others who were evolutionary music artists, never won one
Babydoll Posted November 16, 2014 #39 Report Posted November 16, 2014 Milli vanilli won a grammy but jimi hendrix, Bob marley, Diana Ross, Janis Joplin, Bjork and others who were evolutionary music artists, never won one That's the way Music Industry is Bb
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now