Reminders For Album 9's Era (Precautions For Possible Meltdowns)

[Richie]

9) the first single will probabluy be something really pop and really generic, bc it has to bring easy sales, so don't start bitching and saying she has not soul and she doesn't wanna do this anymore, stop expecting a Rebellion or a Mona Lisa for first single  

[MMbritbritFAN]

9) the first single will probabluy be something really pop and really generic, bc it has to bring easy sales, so don't start bitching and saying she has not soul and she doesn't wanna do this anymore, stop expecting a Rebellion or a Mona Lisa for first single

this!!!!

[Caroline77]

Ok, but if she she can only perform in vegas in north america, what sense does it make to perform in another country when north america is the biggest music market in the world. There's no point to it. Thats promo for other countries and do many americans, america being the biggest consumer in the world, watch international television besides England? Britney Jean would have done the same over here because who would be able to see the promo. And She did promo for britney jean, just no performance promo. So, i get your point and i stand corrected , but to a degree you have to look at it sales wise

 

You still don't understand. The exclusivity clause has nothing to do with promo performances in the first place and even less about the fact that america is the biggest music market. It's not said she can't perform for promo so why do you even try to find a reason when it's not even the point of it ?

Do you know what an exclusivity clause is for ? It's there to prevent someone to do another job, independently or for another employer, so the original employer is the only provider of the goods and the only one to earn profits of it. In other words and in Britney's case, it's there to prevent her to perform for concerts like a tour, concerts that will be funded by sponsors and will bring her money from the fans who pay tickets (unlike promo). She can't do a tour in the US for example while she has a residency in Vegas, because 1st, she's paid by PH to perform in Vegas and PH earns a part of the box office, if she does concerts outside Vegas, PH won't earn any profits of it. And 2nd, why people in other cities would pay to travel to Vegas if she does a show in their cities ? It wouldn't be profitable for Vegas, and would create a competitive conflict and might hurt Vegas sales. That's what the exclusivity clause is for, who cares about promo and the biggest market that's not the point of this. She's not allowed to perform in North America because North America is their targeted audience and they want a competitive advantage, and she's allowed to perform outside North America because international fans aren't their targeted audience and there are no risks (or just minimal) to hurt Vegas sales if she does, it's that simple.

[ALEX -II- 11O39]

You still don't understand. The exclusivity clause has nothing to do with promo performances in the first place and even less about the fact that america is the biggest music market. It's not said she can't perform for promo so why do you even try to find a reason when it's not even the point of it ?

Do you know what an exclusivity clause is for ? It's there to prevent someone to do another job, independently or for another employer, so the original employer is the only provider of the goods and the only one to earn profits of it. In other words and in Britney's case, it's there to prevent her to perform for concerts like a tour, concerts that will be funded by sponsors and will bring her money from the fans who pay tickets (unlike promo). She can't do a tour in the US for example while she has a residency in Vegas, because 1st, she's paid by PH to perform in Vegas and PH earns a part of the box office, if she does concerts outside Vegas, PH won't earn any profits of it. And 2nd, why people in other cities would pay to travel to Vegas if she does a show in their cities ? It wouldn't be profitable for Vegas, and would create a competitive conflict and might hurt Vegas sales. That's what the exclusivity clause is for, who cares about promo and the biggest market that's not the point of this. She's not allowed to perform in North America because North America is their targeted audience and they want a competitive advantage, and she's allowed to perform outside North America because international fans aren't their targeted audience and there are no risks (or just minimal) to hurt Vegas sales if she does, it's that simple.

Gurl exclusive means ONLY HERE.

 

So Exlusive in Las Vegas' Planet Hollywood, means= ONLY IN LAS VEGAS' PLANET HOLLYWOOD.

[Caroline77]

Gurl exclusive means ONLY HERE.

So Exlusive in Las Vegas' Planet Hollywood, means= ONLY IN LAS VEGAS' PLANET HOLLYWOOD.

Yes but ONLY in NORTH AMERICA.

[MMbritbritFAN]

Yes but ONLY in NORTH AMERICA.

omg listen i get what your saying but again answer my question. Where does the logic lie in promoting her show and album outside the u.s do??? Your going on about this but were is the logic? As Britney, if im in vegas and my contract is exclusive in north america, meaning she can't perform anywhere else, that means performing on tv for "promo", then whats thw point of going over seas to do it. Only the fans here in north america knew about her promo in england.

[MMbritbritFAN]

You still don't understand. The exclusivity clause has nothing to do with promo performances in the first place and even less about the fact that america is the biggest music market. It's not said she can't perform for promo so why do you even try to find a reason when it's not even the point of it ?

Do you know what an exclusivity clause is for ? It's there to prevent someone to do another job, independently or for another employer, so the original employer is the only provider of the goods and the only one to earn profits of it. In other words and in Britney's case, it's there to prevent her to perform for concerts like a tour, concerts that will be funded by sponsors and will bring her money from the fans who pay tickets (unlike promo). She can't do a tour in the US for example while she has a residency in Vegas, because 1st, she's paid by PH to perform in Vegas and PH earns a part of the box office, if she does concerts outside Vegas, PH won't earn any profits of it. And 2nd, why people in other cities would pay to travel to Vegas if she does a show in their cities ? It wouldn't be profitable for Vegas, and would create a competitive conflict and might hurt Vegas sales. That's what the exclusivity clause is for, who cares about promo and the biggest market that's not the point of this. She's not allowed to perform in North America because North America is their targeted audience and they want a competitive advantage, and she's allowed to perform outside North America because international fans aren't their targeted audience and there are no risks (or just minimal) to hurt Vegas sales if she does, it's that simple.

ps dont you know their losing money that way still, just like people uploading her shows on youtube. Also, there is risk to having invested so much money in a show and then having that star perform and getting early critiques of how the show might go, thus risking ticket sales. And for the last damn time, she promoted vegas and her album, just say she didnt do any Performance promo, cause in this fan base there is a difference. And like i said before, she can't perform anywhere but in vegas. Even doing it for free loses money. And if you watched her documentary, everyone was behind scheduale, where do you think her choreographers would have time to block a number for promo.

[ALEX -II- 11O39]

Yes but ONLY in NORTH AMERICA.

................................ which means that... if she is in north america, the only place she can perform is Planet Hollywood? and then outside of North America, she can do whatever she wants?

[Caroline77]

................................ which means that... if she is in north america, the only place she can perform is Planet Hollywood? and then outside of North America, she can do whatever she wants?

 

Yes

[britneystanstan]

She will also say a song will mean a lot to her, then lip it and perform it like she's in prison.

[ValetGirls]

You still don't understand. The exclusivity clause has nothing to do with promo performances in the first place and even less about the fact that america is the biggest music market. It's not said she can't perform for promo so why do you even try to find a reason when it's not even the point of it ?

Do you know what an exclusivity clause is for ? It's there to prevent someone to do another job, independently or for another employer, so the original employer is the only provider of the goods and the only one to earn profits of it. In other words and in Britney's case, it's there to prevent her to perform for concerts like a tour, concerts that will be funded by sponsors and will bring her money from the fans who pay tickets (unlike promo). She can't do a tour in the US for example while she has a residency in Vegas, because 1st, she's paid by PH to perform in Vegas and PH earns a part of the box office, if she does concerts outside Vegas, PH won't earn any profits of it. And 2nd, why people in other cities would pay to travel to Vegas if she does a show in their cities ? It wouldn't be profitable for Vegas, and would create a competitive conflict and might hurt Vegas sales. That's what the exclusivity clause is for, who cares about promo and the biggest market that's not the point of this. She's not allowed to perform in North America because North America is their targeted audience and they want a competitive advantage, and she's allowed to perform outside North America because international fans aren't their targeted audience and there are no risks (or just minimal) to hurt Vegas sales if she does, it's that simple.

 

People read this. An exclusivity clause does not conflict with a promotional performance because nobody makes money off of it, it only represents an expenditure on behalf of Team Britney. The exclusivity clause only means that, if Britney is going to be performing for money, then only Planet Hollywood can host that performance (in North America) because they're the only ones with rights to makes a sponsorship profit off of her performances. Since promo performances don't make money for an artist, they are allowed.

 

now stop. There will still be meltdowns come B9. it's a given. now take an Axis Amphitheatre full of seats and stop with the nonsense. Thank you

[Caroline77]

People read this. An exclusivity clause does not conflict with a promotional performance because nobody makes money off of it, it only represents an expenditure on behalf of Team Britney. The exclusivity clause only means that, if Britney is going to be performing for money, then only Planet Hollywood can host that performance (in North America) because they're the only ones with rights to makes a sponsorship profit off of her performances. Since promo performances don't make money for an artist, they are allowed.

 

now stop. There will still be meltdowns come B9. it's a given. now take an Axis Amphitheatre full of seats and stop with the nonsense. Thank you

 

THANK YOU for understanding i'm not english i had hard time to find the words to explain that omg

[Maria Spears]

People read this. An exclusivity clause does not conflict with a promotional performance because nobody makes money off of it, it only represents an expenditure on behalf of Team Britney. The exclusivity clause only means that, if Britney is going to be performing for money, then only Planet Hollywood can host that performance (in North America) because they're the only ones with rights to makes a sponsorship profit off of her performances. Since promo performances don't make money for an artist, they are allowed.

 

now stop. There will still be meltdowns come B9. it's a given. now take an Axis Amphitheatre full of seats and stop with the nonsense. Thank you

YES!!

I said that once and i got dragged. I think she doesn't do promo performances is because she simply doesn't want to do them.

[BraveNewSeth]

1) is false ffs, stop with that stupid contract excuse. SHE doesnt do promo because SHE doesnt want to, it's not the contract. She can perform anywhere she wants outside North America. (and yet it's not even specified if it's about any type of performances including promo, or just concerts) so no it doesnt say she cant do promo.

Thank you! Good lord, it's nice to see that there are some non-deluded fans left. Britney doesn't promote because she doesn't want to, if you haven't learned this by now... I don't even know. I'm sure if the contract stated she couldn't promote she would get that shit changed immediately. She doesn't want to. Learn this please people.

[WeKeepOnRockin]

Britney is the Madonna of our generation, theyre careers have been similar its kinda scary 

so Britney might be succesful coz shes gonna have her Confessions 

 

Beyonce is the Janet of our generation, her damita jo flop is coming soon 

 

Gaga is the mariah of our generation, glitter and artpop 

 

 

No, i was talking about release type. Like Bey.

Although I liked Katy's way! That was amazing!

She should do something like Ariana did and broadcast an exclusive iHeart Radio concert from Planet Hollywood for people who pre-order the album

[WeKeepOnRockin]

Well, then, why do you ask what i'm talking about ? it's exactly what i said. She's only exclusive in NORTH AMERICA, meaning she CAN perform OUTSIDE NORTH AMERICA. And it's also not specified if this exclusivity clause is also including promo performance or if it's just about concerts performances. 

= She doesn't do promo because SHE doesn't want to, not because of the contract.

she probably hated the album and/or was embarrassed by it. 

[Brian.TheDog]

7) They will market it as a record she's worked hard on again, but reports will AGAIN surface she had little control over the album and her original idea was scrapped.

 

Wow. Shocker. :ooyeah:

 

 

"It's my most personal album.........i mean it....out of all the 6 albums i have, this new one is the best one"

[Brian.TheDog]

You still don't understand. The exclusivity clause has nothing to do with promo performances in the first place and even less about the fact that america is the biggest music market. It's not said she can't perform for promo so why do you even try to find a reason when it's not even the point of it ?

Do you know what an exclusivity clause is for ? It's there to prevent someone to do another job, independently or for another employer, so the original employer is the only provider of the goods and the only one to earn profits of it. In other words and in Britney's case, it's there to prevent her to perform for concerts like a tour, concerts that will be funded by sponsors and will bring her money from the fans who pay tickets (unlike promo). She can't do a tour in the US for example while she has a residency in Vegas, because 1st, she's paid by PH to perform in Vegas and PH earns a part of the box office, if she does concerts outside Vegas, PH won't earn any profits of it. And 2nd, why people in other cities would pay to travel to Vegas if she does a show in their cities ? It wouldn't be profitable for Vegas, and would create a competitive conflict and might hurt Vegas sales. That's what the exclusivity clause is for, who cares about promo and the biggest market that's not the point of this. She's not allowed to perform in North America because North America is their targeted audience and they want a competitive advantage, and she's allowed to perform outside North America because international fans aren't their targeted audience and there are no risks (or just minimal) to hurt Vegas sales if she does, it's that simple.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[MMbritbritFAN]

Ok, so im more up to speed, this is about her not getting on good morning america and performing for Britney Jean and also not performing outside north america? so because for that one album, she is lazy and is subjected to bashing all because things didnt go the way any one of us thought while she has entertained us and the world for almost 16 years?

[britneystanstan]

Ok, so im more up to speed, this is about her not getting on good morning america and performing for Britney Jean and also not performing outside north america? so because for that one album, she is lazy and is subjected to bashing all because things didnt go the way any one of us thought while she has entertained us and the world for almost 16 years?

No. This is about her not performing well/releasing the albums she wants SINCE 2004. That is 10 years of Armney, Gimme More 2007ney, Femme Fatale promo performances, etc.

The fanbase did not conclude she is lazy and passionless from one era alone. You can even make a case for Lazyney as early as In the Zone.

[LiaLovesGodney]

No. This is about her not performing well/releasing the albums she wants SINCE 2004. That is 10 years of Armney, Gimme More 2007ney, Femme Fatale promo performances, etc.

The fanbase did not conclude she is lazy and passionless from one era alone. You can even make a case for Lazyney as early as In the Zone.

Exactly. We aren't so picky that these accusations came out of nowhere or were based off of just one era.

[BLACKOUT<3]

9) the first single will probabluy be something really pop and really generic, bc it has to bring easy sales, so don't start bitching and saying she has not soul and she doesn't wanna do this anymore, stop expecting a Rebellion or a Mona Lisa for first single

Thank you were gonna get a work bitch

Who cares britney had her prime

Every artist had their prime and faded let's face it britney faded in 2011 it's time for a new butch to fill in Beyonce who is just horrible and Lordy Gaga

[MMbritbritFAN]

Exactly. We aren't so picky that these accusations came out of nowhere or were based off of just one era.

ok, so i get it now. Even though she has 16+ years in the business, she has not met our standards of what she can be as an entertainer and therefore, she must raise her game if she ever wants to dominate the music scene again and if not, then she will be a complete hasbeen by 35 and beyonce will be laughing at her....ok got it!

[britneystanstan]

ok, so i get it now. Even though she has 16+ years in the business, she has not met our standards of what she can be as an entertainer and therefore, she must raise her game if she ever wants to dominate the music scene again and if not, then she will be a complete hasbeen by 35 and beyonce will be laughing at her....ok got it!

Pretty much

Except she was already a hasbeen at 32

[LiaLovesGodney]

ok, so i get it now. Even though she has 16+ years in the business, she has not met our standards of what she can be as an entertainer and therefore, she must raise her game if she ever wants to dominate the music scene again and if not, then she will be a complete hasbeen by 35 and beyonce will be laughing at her....ok got it!

I don't necessarily want her to dominate the industry again. I just want her to put out quality music and work to her full potential, whatever that may be now). This isn't about comparing Britney to out artists, but instead herself. I couldn't care less about hype or sales, just the fact that I don't think Britney gives her all as much as she did before.