Vegas Ownership Of Britney's Image

[Britney M. Carey]

You made a point there

[Caroline77]

but she did the S&S remix video around the time of the whole Britney Jean recordings.

Who cares of recordings? It wasn't RELEASED at the same time. Britney's lead single is out soon, beginning of the year which means february/march, april very maximum. Giorgio Album will be out during this spring which is the same period, if Britney collab would be a single with a video both Britney own single and Britney collab would be out at the same time.

There was like a year between S&S and Work Bitch.

[howwasisupposetoknow]

Who cares of recordings? It wasn't RELEASED at the same time. Britney's lead single is out soon, beginning of the year which means february/march, april very maximum. Giorgio Album will be out during this spring which is the same period, if Britney collab would be a single with a video both Britney own single and Britney collab would be out at the same time.

There was like a year between S&S and Work Bitch

But the point i was trying to make originally was that PH owns britney as a performer. Yes, RCA gets money for album sales and what not but as a majority of people know the money is all in the live performances and PH in that regard has much more to gain from a hit album right now.

[Caroline77]

But the point i was trying to make originally was that PH owns britney as a performer. Yes, RCA gets money for album sales and what not but as a majority of people know the money is all in the live performances and PH in that regard has much more to gain from a hit album right now.

But as long as anything is a hit Vegas will be happy so the fact that it's on Britney's album or not doesn't matter for Vegas, especially when she will sing the WHOLE song so she could add it to the show, it's not like she will sing just 1 chorus and the rest is another artist. A video for this collab would be exposition for Britney, if it's a hit that's even better, which means exposition for Vegas which means people will go to the show which means money in their pockets.

Anything that Britney could do would be exposition for them anyway. She did videos for her lingerie collection so it doesn't make sense that Vegas wouldn't let her do video for the collab while it would be nothing but exposition for them. The only one that could be bothered by this is RCA, hence why imo it makes more sense that it's because of them if she can't, not Vegas.

[howwasisupposetoknow]

But as long as anything is a hit Vegas will be happy so the fact that it's on Britney's album or not doesn't matter for Vegas, especially when she will sing the WHOLE song so she could add it to the show, it's not like she will sing just 1 chorus and the rest is another artist. A video for this collab would be exposition for Britney, if it's a hit that's even better, which means exposition for Vegas which means people will go to the show which means money in their pockets.

Anything that Britney could do would be exposition for them anyway. She did videos for her lingerie collection so it doesn't make sense that Vegas wouldn't let her do video for the collab while it would be nothing but exposition for them. The only one that could be bothered by this is RCA, hence why imo it makes more sense that it's because of them if she can't, not Vegas.

a video of her posing is much different than a video of her performing. Im not saying RCA doesn't have a hand in this, but Vegas does too. But more so Vegas because Britney is a live performer more than a singer

[tarotx]

But Britney could make and appear in videos without her dancing and singing. For example most of Katy Perry's Part of me (Acting as a character)and Mumford and sons's Whispers in the Dark(the singers doing their own thing getting to a concert venue). Britney has appeared in Intimate collection commerical as well as done cameos in her Instagram videos. So the notion of no videos is just not believable.