Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Why wikipedia? Only account of britney albums sales in the '' RECORDS '' category  of the best selling artists, says she has sold over 100 million Records , but I was checking all placed references there and only are certifications by the sales of her albums and many certifications are wrong because says britney only has 71.5 million certified albums when britney today has over 80,5 million albums certified and over 100 million ALBUMS in claimed sales by her label, billboard and others reliable sources etc... the other thing is that they never  do any mention or reference to her singles sales in any reference that is there and she has best seller singles too even they are mentioned  ''on best selling singles list'' on wikipedia as Baby One More Time, toxic, womanizer, TTWED, S & M, S & S,  etc., and obvious her other singles with lower sales also counts.  Rihanna  is above of her on the list with less of 30 million albums sales certified  and also taylor swift but for them wikipedia account everything: sales of albums + singles + digital download + streams, is not fair to britney and to many others artistis who are comtemporanies with her for them they only count albums sales  but for the new artists they  count their overall records and inflate their sales, WHEN on real overall records Britney has sold more than them, counting the singles Britney has 185 million certified sales ( 80 M albums+97M singles+DVDs and VH sales) over  200 million overall Records in claimed sales or  even more now with the news rules if you add the streams of her videos on vevo each one certificate with a hundred million views on vevo equivalent today a platinum certified for the single, so britney has 8 singles  with platinium streams certifications added.

 

That's bother me . :4music:

  • Like 2
Posted

Wikipedia has fake information like Britney Jean album sold Its 600k but there they typed 200k and Femme fatale is 3M ? Well they showed it as 700k

What? they only show 700K for Femme fatale? but if FF even has certification in USA for  platinum on RIAA oficial page., what really bothers me is that they inflate the sales of the new best selling artists:  like Rihanna or taylor counting everything even certifications of the views and streams but to artists britney's generation they only shows the sales albums, for example madonna, elvis , mariah, michael, the beatles, whitney, are so high because they have sold over 200 million in albums each one ( only in ALBUMS) because also to them they are very few reference of their singles, but to the new artists they add everything. :4music:​ 

Posted

Records - is not only albums - It is LP, Vinyl, EP, and in some cases maxi singles.. 

 

GH, DVD EP's etc need to be included in that figure.

Exactly :tea2: ! they need to include all her sales not only the albums, but they only updated the sales of current artists, britney has several years with only the sales of her albums there :displeased:  and not her overall records, :4music:  while Rihanna, Katy Perry, Bruno Mars, Gaga and the new best sellers artists by the new rules they keep their overall records numbers updated constantly. :omg1:

Posted

Exactly :tea2: ! they need to include all her sales not only the albums, but they only updated the sales of current artists, britney has several years with only the sales of her albums there :displeased:  and not her overall records, :4music:  while Rihanna, Katy Perry, Bruno Mars, Gaga and the new best sellers artists by the new rules they keep their overall records numbers updated constantly. :omg1:

 

We need to get a Britney correspondent on wiki TBH - that is always updating her info. :uhhuh:

Posted

We need to get a Britney correspondent on wiki TBH - that is always updating her info. :uhhuh:

Lol :pieceofwhat:  we've talked about it a thousand times but it is difficult to become moderator you have to have a lot of time as a member :zoomzoom:  and all your previous editions need to be regarded by them as reliables :displeased:​  the problem with wikipedia in biographies and discographies of artists is that there are many stans as moderators, for example I have found with madonna, beyonce, taylor, christina stans :awkwarddd:  and obvious they keep updated their favorite and even inflate some facts or revert to other artists facts and records or when you have some reliable sources if they hate the artist closed the page and nobody can edit it :omg1:  I'm not saying that all them do  that. but ... :4music:

Posted

I've heard that ppl who edit britneys wiki page are some kids who are around 16-17 and they are christina katy and taylor stans, so the keep giving fake info about Britney and minorizing her work, pressed lil cunts, someone needs to rape their butts with a bbc, lil hoes.

  • Like 2
Posted

Why wikipedia? Only account of britney albums sales in the '' RECORDS '' category  of the best selling artists, says she has sold over 100 million Records , but I was checking all placed references there and only are certifications by the sales of her albums and many certifications are wrong because says britney only has 71.5 million certified albums when britney today has over 80,5 million albums certified and over 100 million ALBUMS in claimed sales by her label, billboard and others reliable sources etc... the other thing is that they never  do any mention or reference to her singles sales in any reference that is there and she has best seller singles too even they are mentioned  ''on best selling singles list'' on wikipedia as Baby One More Time, toxic, womanizer, TTWED, S & M, S & S,  etc., and obvious her other singles with lower sales also counts.  Rihanna  is above of her on the list with less of 30 million albums sales certified  and also taylor swift but for them wikipedia account everything: sales of albums + singles + digital download + streams, is not fair to britney and to many others artistis who are comtemporanies with her for them they only count albums sales  but for the new artists they  count their overall records and inflate their sales, WHEN on real overall records Britney has sold more than them, counting the singles Britney has 185 million certified sales ( 80 M albums+97M singles+DVDs and VH sales) over  200 million overall Records in claimed sales or  even more now with the news rules if you add the streams of her videos on vevo each one certificate with a hundred million views on vevo equivalent today a platinum certified for the single, so britney has 8 singles  with platinium streams certifications added.

 

That's bother me . :4music:

Britney has been RIAA Certified with over 100 Million Albums sold Worldwide in 2012 or 2013 see receipt.

http://www.mymusiclists.com/artists/best-female-artist-ever/britney-spears-443.asp

  • Like 1
Guest Lᴜᴠ3�ɪ♥Hᴀᴛᴇ�ɪ
Posted

get a mod position   :orly:

:soofunny:

Posted

 

Britney has been RIAA Certified with over 100 Million Albums sold Worldwide in 2012 or 2013 see receipt.

http://www.mymusiclists.com/artists/best-female-artist-ever/britney-spears-443.asp

 

RIAA only certifies the sales in  USA they can not certify Worldwide sales,  WW sales are certified by the IPFI, I know that Britney has sold over 100 million albums are the sales  acclaimed by label, but I talk about this list because should be placed her overall records in total not only her ALBUMS that's why Rihanna who has sold 30 million albums is above of britney there because they count her singles and more....

Posted

Lol :pieceofwhat:  we've talked about it a thousand times but it is difficult to become moderator you have to have a lot of time as a member :zoomzoom:  and all your previous editions need to be regarded by them as reliables :displeased:​  the problem with wikipedia in biographies and discographies of artists is that there are many stans as moderators, for example I have found with madonna, beyonce, taylor, christina stans :awkwarddd:  and obvious they keep updated their favorite and even inflate some facts or revert to other artists facts and records or when you have some reliable sources if they hate the artist closed the page and nobody can edit it :omg1:  I'm not saying that all them do  that. but ... :4music:

It is retarded - cause it should be facts only.. I hate wiki for that! 

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines