Tommy_0212 Posted June 8, 2014 #1 Report Posted June 8, 2014 Tbh I prefer her vids that have stories behind them... Like toxic or Womanizer I don't like this new 'posey' Britney... Girl needs to get down and slay!! How cool would it be if Britney had returned back to hight school.... As the head teacher... Chanting work bitch in assembly... With some sexy specs and a pencil skirt
Cold As Fire Posted June 8, 2014 #2 Report Posted June 8, 2014 They didn't spend 5 million dollars on it. Where did you get that from?
AnnDroid Posted June 8, 2014 #4 Report Posted June 8, 2014 Work Bitch didn't cost 5 million. It was just a rumor.
Tommy_0212 Posted June 8, 2014 Author #5 Report Posted June 8, 2014 They didn't spend 5 million dollars on it. Where did you get that from? Aparantly it was her most expensive video to date and cost that much
wohoo Posted June 8, 2014 #6 Report Posted June 8, 2014 Aparantly it was her most expensive video to date and cost that much no.
Britney_Dorgas Posted June 8, 2014 #7 Report Posted June 8, 2014 Work Bitch video was the only thing that was actually successful this era, and it freaking slays, so... no just no
ROUGE Posted June 8, 2014 #8 Report Posted June 8, 2014 The video turned out great regardless though. The only reason I think it was a waste was because Britney didn't promote the song which stopped the song from selling and reaching it's potential. So it's like, what's the point of an expensive video?
Cold As Fire Posted June 8, 2014 #9 Report Posted June 8, 2014 Aparantly it was her most expensive video to date and cost that much http://www.mtv.com/news/1715064/britney-spears-work-bitch-director-ben-mor-interview/ First off, he shot down speculation that the video cost upward of $6.5 million. "There's such bullsh-- out there. I wish! The thing... I shouldn't say it but it's not even a fraction of that. It's 200 percent absolutely false and it's almost embarrassing to say. The video absolutely did not cost that much," he said. "It's just a lot of misinformation."
kweenbritney Posted June 8, 2014 #10 Report Posted June 8, 2014 The video turned out great regardless though. The only reason I think it was a waste was because Britney didn't promote the song which stopped the song from selling and reaching it's potential. So it's like, what's the point of an expensive video?
WeKeepOnRockin Posted June 8, 2014 #12 Report Posted June 8, 2014 That car alone, just to rent it, was like 500k, no?
HeavenOnEarth Posted June 8, 2014 #17 Report Posted June 8, 2014 It is one of my fave videos... Mine too. It slays everytime I watch it! 1
David Posted June 8, 2014 #18 Report Posted June 8, 2014 NO. EVERYTHING ABOUT THE VIDEO AND SONG IS F L A W L E S S 1
Term of Endearment Posted June 8, 2014 #19 Report Posted June 8, 2014 Mine too. It slays everytime I watch it! It is hot and gave me 2004 vibes
HeavenOnEarth Posted June 8, 2014 #20 Report Posted June 8, 2014 And does it matter? WB slays lives anyways exactly!
IGOTYOUCRAZY Posted June 8, 2014 #21 Report Posted June 8, 2014 First of all, the video didn't even cost that much Second, no, it's one of her best videos in production and editing imo, not a waste at all. I just wish they had promoted it more. Still, it reached the 110 million views mark, that's impressive! 1
Term of Endearment Posted June 8, 2014 #22 Report Posted June 8, 2014 NO. EVERYTHING ABOUT THE VIDEO AND SONG IS F L A W L E S S Hi Pi!! 1
HeavenOnEarth Posted June 8, 2014 #25 Report Posted June 8, 2014 It is hot and gave me 2004 vibes I remember that the first thing I did was download the video in 1080p and watch it on my TV, out loud. My neighbours probably hate me, bc I do it every time I'm alone at home hahaha 1
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now