kasavas Posted June 11, 2014 #2 Report Posted June 11, 2014 She had a H-O-R-R-I-B-L-E style,but come on,her body looked good. Just because we're Britney fans,it doesn't mean that we can't admire someone else's beauty body. But yeah,Britney was way better. She had a beautiful face,and she was sexy without being a slut.
Christino Posted June 11, 2014 Author #3 Report Posted June 11, 2014 She had a H-O-R-R-I-B-L-E style,but come on,her body looked good. Just because we're Britney fans,it doesn't mean that we can't admire someone else's beauty body. But yeah,Britney was way better. She had a beautiful face,and she was sexy without being a slut. Her body shape was so odd 3
James Posted June 11, 2014 #4 Report Posted June 11, 2014 She had a H-O-R-R-I-B-L-E style,but come on,her body looked good. Just because we're Britney fans,it doesn't mean that we can't admire someone else's beauty body. But yeah,Britney was way better. She had a beautiful face,and she was sexy without being a slut. OMG what is this?
David Posted June 11, 2014 #5 Report Posted June 11, 2014 that's just a bad picture, she always used to be a goddess
Natooolee Posted June 11, 2014 #6 Report Posted June 11, 2014 She had a H-O-R-R-I-B-L-E style,but come on,her body looked good. Just because we're Britney fans,it doesn't mean that we can't admire someone else's beauty body. But yeah,Britney was way better. She had a beautiful face,and she was sexy without being a slut. IA. I did like that era from her though, poor fashion sense and all. How she ended up looking how she looks now is beyond me. But Britney has always been special
ValetGirls Posted June 11, 2014 #7 Report Posted June 11, 2014 Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but she looked way hotter in Candyman than in those photos y'all 2
Captain Morgan Posted June 11, 2014 #8 Report Posted June 11, 2014 She was still a pear-shaped, unfortunately bow-legged crap sack. Thar be more to a nice body than bein' slim!
Term of Endearment Posted June 11, 2014 #9 Report Posted June 11, 2014 I loved the stripped stage of her career - but one thing she was thin - and looked OK - but she was never defined and toned like Britney during the same period... Lets be honest..
1981 Posted June 11, 2014 #10 Report Posted June 11, 2014 I always thought Xtina was attractive but her body imo was nothing special...
Bawbbyy Posted June 12, 2014 #11 Report Posted June 12, 2014 There's never been anything special about her body or her looks. And her personality is the ugliest of them all.
Christino Posted June 12, 2014 Author #12 Report Posted June 12, 2014 I loved the stripped stage of her career - but one thing she was thin - and looked OK - but she was never defined and toned like Britney during the same period... Lets be honest.. her body shape was odd...
Galliano Brinni Posted June 12, 2014 #13 Report Posted June 12, 2014 Her curve just doesn't show on those pics
Lascivious Posted June 12, 2014 #14 Report Posted June 12, 2014 You can get as skinny as you want, if you're not naturally shaped a certain way and you don't have a waistline, you'll never have it. I never thought Xtina had a nice shape. She has no waist.
Fearless Posted June 12, 2014 #15 Report Posted June 12, 2014 I don't think she ever had anything that could be called her prime, in not a single aspect of her career tbh :oopsss:
OohLaLa Posted June 12, 2014 #17 Report Posted June 12, 2014 Maybe I'm old-fashioned, but she looked way hotter in Candyman than in those photos y'all I agree. She was hot and still classy
§ejtan Posted June 12, 2014 #18 Report Posted June 12, 2014 xtina during 2006-7-8>>bionic/that movie>>>>>and post weight loss xtina maxim shoot etc so hot lbr
Term of Endearment Posted June 12, 2014 #19 Report Posted June 12, 2014 it wasn't that great Truth tea - could have been better tbh... still not bad though...
ValetGirls Posted June 12, 2014 #21 Report Posted June 12, 2014 I agree. She was hot and still classy
HeavenOnEarth Posted June 12, 2014 #22 Report Posted June 12, 2014 But yeah,Britney was way better. She had a beautiful face,and she was sexy without being a slut. THIS! She looks so trashy! It's disgusting tbh 1
Peaches Posted June 12, 2014 #23 Report Posted June 12, 2014 She had a H-O-R-R-I-B-L-E style,but come on,her body looked good. Just because we're Britney fans,it doesn't mean that we can't admire someone else's beauty body. But yeah,Britney was way better. She had a beautiful face,and she was sexy without being a slut. But no, not really I mean, Xtina was skinny. Not fit. Look at her weird shape and body parts. Not one part of her body was tight. Britney on the other hand was fit as fuuuck
kasavas Posted June 12, 2014 #24 Report Posted June 12, 2014 But no, not really I mean, Xtina was skinny. Not fit. Look at her weird shape and body parts. Not one part of her body was tight. Britney on the other hand was fit as fuuuck Yes,I agree that Britney was way better,but Christina's body wasn't ugly either.
kasavas Posted June 12, 2014 #25 Report Posted June 12, 2014 THIS! She looks so trashy! It's disgusting tbh
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now