Jump to content

Judge Denies Petition to Suspend Jamie, Will Be Heard Sept 29!


Recommended Posts

Posted

Unfortunate, but not surprising. Perhaps her calendar was full, but it's alarming that even a medical team stating it's in Britney's best interest for him to at least be suspended until the hearing wasn't enough. Hope Rosengart is ready. 

 

  • Mad 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Godney's Sweet Ass said:

She doesn't even have to justify it? WTF? CONGRESS!!!!!

It says without prejudice which means Rosengart can (and hopefully will) refile. I feel like he was going easy and light with the first one and will be more aggressive now that he knows exactly what he's dealing with regarding this judge. 

  • Upvote 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Godney's Sweet Ass said:

Hope you're right. I just cannot understand Penny's reasoning or judgement. I'd feel less worried if Satan were in charge of Britney's cship. 

I read that judges in the probate court don't make decisions without court appointed people telling them what to do. In my opinion, this ruling is based on her previous one. When Ingham asked for his suspension and she did they same thing- denied without prejudice. It's Rosengart's move now! And he's already a million times more efficient and competent than Ingham was. 

  • Upvote 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines