Reason For Conservatorship

[ooh la la]

so i came up with a theory for the conservatorship. do you think she is still under it because maybe by law it stops paparazzi following her. maybe because she is considered a child in the legal sense it prevents the paparazzi from being legally able to follow her. in los angelas  can they legally follow children without getting in trouble with the law. maybe they couldn't change the law to prevent adults been followed so they came up with the idea of keeping her under conservatorship so then legally they would be able to stop the paparazzi following her.

[Guest Zooey Deschanel]

if you watch circus, you'll find it out

 

[Jay.]

I think it's because of the money. 

[Caroline77]

Lol no. Conservatorship or not paparazzi are there. They just don't follow her like they used to because she's not really interesting for them now.

The only reasons the conservatorship is still there (because let's be honest, even if we don't know her personally it's obvious she doesn't need it anymore imo) is mostly to protect her assets  and in case people want to sue her. 

 

I think that video might help : 

[Britnoy]

I think it's because of the money. 

[heather]

no. And it's none of our business

[ooh la la]

i don't agree with it not being our business because it can have an effect on future law cases and open the door for abuses in relation to people being put under conservatorship if a person now is under conservatorship for fraudulent reasons. because law is moulded by past cases in a court the judge looks at the actual law and also common law cases in order to make a decision.

[Joanhs]

I'm getting tired of writing the same thing over and over again:
The reason the conservatorship is still in place is:

1) private, we don't know

2) insurance.. Nobody wants to insurence her tours, or her vegas deal, not even her x-factor deal could be signed without having the c-ship. People are afraid of what will happen, so they trust her mostly under the conservatorship. Her reputation from 2007 (not giving a care about showing up on time, not proper rehearsed enough for VMA, and the chaos) is still haunting her.

[Puzla986]

Lol no. Conservatorship or not paparazzi are there. They just don't follow her like they used to because she's not really interesting for them now.

The only reasons the conservatorship is still there (because let's be honest, even if we don't know her personally it's obvious she doesn't need it anymore imo) is mostly to protect her assets  and in case people want to sue her. 

 

I think that video might help : 

Very informative video! Thank you for posting it!

[ooh la la]

you should not be allowed to put someone under conservatorship to guarantee insurance that is fraudulent. you can not coerce a person to stay under conservatorship to secure work contracts it does not make sense. if there was a doubt that she would not fufill her contract if she was not under conservatorship you would think businesses would use assets to act like a guarantor if she was that high of a risk. when banks are given out  loans they get another person who has assets to act as a gaurantor in the event that the person who takes out the loan defaults on their loan obligation. the gaurantor pays the money that the person who took out the loan defaulted on. if britney does have a mental breakdown again how will a conservatorship protect the investors in the different projects from losing money. why would insurance companies think that being under conservatorship would make her more insurable. a conservatorship does not stop a person from having mental health problems and stop a person from not being fit to carry out the duties of the work contract. it would make more sense to secure potential loss against her assets because that is all the insurance companies care about money, if they knew that they would recoup their money then there would be no issue. in relation to custody i don't see how mental illness can be used as a weapon are you allowed to discriminate like that .if a person displays that they have been behaving in a consistent rational manner for the last six years how can they be denied custody. in relation to sam suing her and making her testify in court if michael jackson can make all those cases go away quietly i don't see how britney can't money and confidentiality contract..

[LiaLovesGodney]

i don't agree with it not being our business because it can have an effect on future law cases and open the door for abuses in relation to people being put under conservatorship if a person now is under conservatorship for fraudulent reasons. because law is moulded by past cases in a court the judge looks at the actual law and also common law cases in order to make a decision.

I think it's acceptable to question the circumstances of Britney's conservatorship. There's never been one like it before, and I don't mean that in a good way. If people always said that other people's issues were none of our business, then we'd never be able to call out anything unlawful, unethical, fraudulent, abusive, etc...