Jump to content

Perfume's Live Performance Has Sia's Voice But Also Britney's Live Singing In It! Proof Inside!

Mojito

By Mojito
in Britney Spears

 Share

Recommended Posts

  • Replies 49
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Top Posters In This Topic

Popular Days

Popular Posts

Caroline77
Caroline77

The fact that she's lip syncing is ridiculous. So the fact that we can hear Sia vocals is just even more ridiculous.

JoshLee
JoshLee

It still wouldn't matter. If she did sing live people would say it's a backing track!

ALLEYESONUS!
ALLEYESONUS!

OH she's saying current album now instead of new        put that on the list of changes 

Mojito Apprentice

Mojito

Posted
  • Author
  •  #7
Posted

But it's so stupid! They should play main vocals mix or just mute Sia's vocals -.- It's like proving the world that she is lip syncing :/

 

What if Britney wanted to sing that part along with Sia's voice, but she got self-conscious about her voice in the last sec and she decided to lip-sync it instead :bomt:  

  • Like 1
Caroline77 Contributor

Caroline77

Posted
Posted

live, prerecorded or straight off the cd it doesn't matter. you can hear BRITNEY'S voice so the fact that there are sia vocals as well is irrelevant

 

The fact that she's lip syncing is ridiculous. So the fact that we can hear Sia vocals is just even more ridiculous.

  • Like 2
heather Mentor

heather

Posted
Posted

But it's so stupid! They should play main vocals mix or just mute Sia's vocals -.- It's like proving the world that she is lip syncing :/

it's stupid that this is even a big deal. everyone is going to assume she's lip syncing anyway it's not "proving" anything.

 

The fact that she's lip syncing is ridiculous. So the fact that we can hear Sia vocals is just even more ridiculous.

the fact that lip syncing is still an issue with britney 15 years later is ridiculous

JoshLee Veteran

JoshLee

Posted
Posted

:4music: You can still hear Britney's voice and what don't y'all understand about backing vocals! Backing vocals are to enhance parts in a song! They can sometimes be a main vocal on chorus's, but that's it! :overitkbye: Gosh just leave the lip syncing thing alone. She's always done it, but she's not the only one who does it! :mhm: MOVE ON!

  • Like 1
▲▼▲BlackoutZone▲▼▲ Rising Star

▲▼▲BlackoutZone▲▼▲

Posted
Posted

it's stupid that this is even a big deal. everyone is going to assume she's lip syncing anyway it's not "proving" anything.

 

the fact that lip syncing is still an issue with britney 15 years later is ridiculous

No it's not she has to finally sing something live -.- People are paying so much money to see that show and they are expecting something. And it is a fucking big deal that she doesn't give a single fuck about singing live!

▲▼▲BlackoutZone▲▼▲ Rising Star

▲▼▲BlackoutZone▲▼▲

Posted
Posted

:4music: You can still hear Britney's voice and what don't y'all understand about backing vocals! Backing vocals are to enhance parts in a song! They can sometimes be a main vocal on chorus's, but that's it! :overitkbye: Gosh just leave the lip syncing thing alone. She's always done it, but she's not the only one who does it! :mhm: MOVE ON!

No she wasn't doing (not taht fucking much) in years 1998 - 2004. Now she is not even pre-recording vocals!

Veis Apprentice

Veis

Posted
Posted

No it's not she has to finally sing something live -.- People are paying so much money to see that show and they are expecting something. And it is a fucking big deal that she doesn't give a single fuck about singing live!

It's Britney, she doesn't need to proof anything  :pieceofwhat:

  • Like 1
heather Mentor

heather

Posted
Posted

No it's not she has to finally sing something live -.- People are paying so much money to see that show and they are expecting something. And it is a fucking big deal that she doesn't give a single fuck about singing live!

she's been dealing with lip syncing accusations her entire career, this isn't gonna make her sing it live :frenchy: i hope no one still goes to a britney show and expects live singing

JoshLee Veteran

JoshLee

Posted
Posted

No she wasn't doing (not taht fucking much) in years 1998 - 2004. Now she is not even pre-recording vocals!

It still wouldn't matter. If she did sing live people would say it's a backing track! :zoomzoom:

  • Like 2
heather Mentor

heather

Posted
Posted

Actually a lot of people do! Her show is in the center of Vegas. Many people that are coming there are not her fans! they just want to see the concert and they are expecing something tbh :4music:

they're not expecting live singing :frenchy: the gp knows she doesn't sing live

▲▼▲BlackoutZone▲▼▲ Rising Star

▲▼▲BlackoutZone▲▼▲

Posted
Posted

they're not expecting live singing :frenchy: the gp knows she doesn't sing live

So imagine how much the world would be suprised when she would sing something! We could be sooo proud of her <3 The promo would slaaaaaaaay! I can't even imagine it. We can't think like "who gives a fuck" bc in few years she will be sitting on the chair for an hour and lip-syncing to her hits from 1999 - I rly don't want it... Circus sung something sometimes, Femme Fatal was almost fully (and clearly) pre-recorded & Piece Of Me - hmm maybe work bitch is pre-recorded in some parts (still can't hear rawney) but that's all! Seeing 32-year old Britney on stage with 16-year old girl's voice in BOMT. Oh Britney, Britney...

heather Mentor

heather

Posted
Posted

So imagine how much the world would be suprised when she would sing something! We could be sooo proud of her <3 The promo would slaaaaaaaay! I can't even imagine it. We can't think like "who gives a fuck" bc in few years she will be sitting on the chair for an hour and lip-syncing to her hits from 1999 - I rly don't want it... Circus sung something sometimes, Femme Fatal was almost fully (and clearly) pre-recorded & Piece Of Me - hmm maybe work bitch is pre-recorded in some parts (still can't hear rawney) but that's all! Seeing 32-year old Britney on stage with 16-year old girl's voice in BOMT. Oh Britney, Britney...

girl don't let your imagination run wild. even if britney sang perfume live ONE time everyone would say it was prerecorded. she can't win either way

Caroline77 Contributor

Caroline77

Posted
Posted

the fact that lip syncing is still an issue with britney 15 years later is ridiculous

 

The fact that they said she would be singing live and she doesn't is ridiculous tho. That's why it's a big issue. If they would have said nothing, it wouldn't have been such a big deal, even if it would still look ridiculous anyway (especially when you're lip syncing over your 15yo vocals, at least put a pre recorded track :drown:). But the fact they said, and even Britney herself, that she would sing live, people expected at least the ballads live. Don't try to return to situation. People don't have to accept something that shouldn't be accepted in the first place even if it's like that since many years (and at least she had pre recorded vocals in the past).

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue. Terms of Use Privacy Policy Guidelines